Skip to content
RENLOW
Sign in

Methodology · Renlow Score™

How the Renlow Score™ works

The Renlow Score™ is a structured assessment of how a business gets paid. It reads one estate against Renlow's modelled reference position across six dimensions and expresses the result as a single figure from 0 to 1000 — so a payment position can be discussed, tracked and improved like any other performance measure.

Range
0 – 1000
One figure, four bands
Dimensions
Six
Each scored 0 – 100
Basis
Modelled reference
Renlow's own model, not a market average
01

The framework

Payment performance is not one number by nature. It is six related questions, each with its own evidence and its own remedy.

01CE

Cost Efficiency

The true cost of accepting a payment, net of every fee and margin.

02PF

Provider Fit

Whether your provider and contract match the business you run today.

03RP

Revenue Performance

Revenue earned but not captured at the payment step.

04GR

Global Readiness

How well the estate handles money and customers outside your home market.

05OS

Operational Simplicity

The finance and engineering effort your payment estate consumes.

06RR

Risk & Resilience

The estate's ability to absorb fraud, disputes and failure.

02

The scale

Bands describe position, not verdict. A score is read alongside the dimensions that produced it — two businesses can share a score for entirely different reasons.

0–499
Needs attention
500–649
Developing
650–779
Competent
780–1000
Optimised

Movement matters more than level. A score is recalculated whenever the estate or the modelled reference position changes, so the trend is the signal.

03

Six dimensions

Each dimension is scored 0–100 against Renlow's modelled reference position. The indicators below are illustrative of the inputs considered; relative weighting is proprietary.

01

Cost Efficiency

Effective cost of acceptance — scheme fees, interchange, acquirer margin, gateway and ancillary charges — read against businesses with a comparable card mix, channel split and volume.

Why it matters

Acceptance cost is the only payment line that scales with every pound of revenue. Under blended pricing the components are invisible, so drift accumulates silently between contract reviews.

How businesses improve it

  • Move from blended to interchange++ so interchange and margin are separately visible.
  • Re-tender against your real card mix rather than a headline rate.
  • Route debit and commercial cards on their correct interchange categories.
  • Review ancillary line items — authorisation, PCI, statement and minimum-monthly fees.

Example indicators considered

  • Effective blended rate across all channels
  • Pricing model in use (blended, interchange++, fixed)
  • Share of volume on debit versus credit and commercial cards
  • Non-transactional fees as a share of total cost
  • Months since the last commercial review

Outcomes of strong performance

  • Acceptance cost at or below Renlow's modelled strong-performance reference
  • Fee changes visible in the month they occur, not the quarter after
  • Margin savings that hold as volume grows
02

Provider Fit

Alignment between your provider, gateway, pricing structure and contract terms and your current volume, channels, markets and growth plan.

Why it matters

Provider fit sets the ceiling on every other dimension. The wrong contract structure caps the savings and capability that no amount of configuration can recover.

How businesses improve it

  • Diarise notice windows and re-tender before auto-renewal, not after.
  • Match the provider to your channel mix rather than to a single flagship product.
  • Hold a credible second option so renewal is a negotiation, not a formality.
  • Remove clauses that penalise volume growth or market expansion.

Example indicators considered

  • Contract length, renewal mechanism and notice period
  • Provider capability against your channels and markets
  • Fit between pricing model and volume band
  • Number of providers and gateways in the estate
  • Exit and migration terms

Outcomes of strong performance

  • Commercial terms reviewed on your timetable
  • Capability headroom for the next two years of growth
  • Genuine leverage at every renewal
03

Revenue Performance

Authorisation performance, checkout completion and recovery of soft declines — including payment-method coverage against how your customers actually pay.

Why it matters

A single point of authorisation rate is usually worth more than a hard-fought cost negotiation, because declined revenue is lost at full margin.

How businesses improve it

  • Adopt network tokenisation on stored credentials so reissued cards keep authorising.
  • Offer wallets and local methods where your traffic already is.
  • Apply retry logic and account updater to soft declines.
  • Reduce checkout fields and exempt low-risk transactions from unnecessary challenges.

Example indicators considered

  • Authorisation rate by channel and card type
  • Soft-decline volume and recovery rate
  • Use of network tokens and account updater
  • Payment methods offered against device and market mix
  • Checkout completion and abandonment at the payment step

Outcomes of strong performance

  • Authorisation in line with Renlow's modelled strong-performance reference
  • Recovered revenue at full margin with no pricing change
  • Fewer customers lost between basket and confirmation
04

Global Readiness

Currency coverage, local acquiring, settlement currencies, cross-border margin exposure and authorisation performance on foreign-issued cards.

Why it matters

Cross-border volume is charged twice — once as margin on cost and once as lost conversion on authorisation. Both are avoidable with local structure.

How businesses improve it

  • Open local acquiring in markets that carry material volume.
  • Settle in the currency you sell in rather than converting on every payout.
  • Price and display in local currency to reduce issuer declines.
  • Add locally trusted payment methods in each priority market.

Example indicators considered

  • Share of volume from foreign-issued cards
  • Settlement and presentment currencies in use
  • Local acquiring coverage against active markets
  • Cross-border and FX margin exposure
  • Authorisation gap between domestic and international traffic

Outcomes of strong performance

  • Cross-border margin removed from a measurable share of volume
  • Higher local authorisation without new checkout work
  • Market expansion that does not require replatforming
05

Operational Simplicity

Settlement timing, reconciliation effort, reporting consolidation and how quickly finance can detect a pricing or performance change.

Why it matters

Slow settlement is a financing cost, and split reporting means fee drift and failed volume surface quarters late — long after they became expensive.

How businesses improve it

  • Shorten settlement instruction where your provider supports it.
  • Consolidate online and card-present reporting into one ledger.
  • Automate reconciliation against settlement files rather than statements.
  • Set monthly monitoring on effective rate and authorisation by channel.

Example indicators considered

  • Settlement cycle and payout frequency
  • Number of systems required for a full reconciliation
  • Manual finance hours spent on payments each month
  • Availability of transaction-level settlement data
  • Time to detect a change in effective rate

Outcomes of strong performance

  • Working capital released from the settlement cycle
  • Finance hours returned each month
  • Cost and performance changes caught in-month
06

Risk & Resilience

Fraud and dispute performance, compliance position, authentication configuration, uptime history and dependency concentration across providers.

Why it matters

Strong fraud control protects margin; resilience protects revenue. A single acquirer with no fallback route places all revenue on one dependency.

How businesses improve it

  • Add a secondary acquirer for failover routing and renewal leverage.
  • Tune authentication so exemptions apply to genuinely low-risk traffic.
  • Monitor dispute rates against scheme thresholds monthly.
  • Keep PCI scope narrow and remediation closed.

Example indicators considered

  • Dispute and fraud rate against scheme monitoring thresholds
  • Authentication and exemption configuration
  • Provider concentration and failover coverage
  • Reported uptime and incident history
  • PCI scope and open remediation items

Outcomes of strong performance

  • Dispute performance comfortably inside scheme thresholds
  • Revenue continuity during a provider incident
  • Compliance position that does not constrain growth
04

How a score is built

Four steps, in order. Nothing is inferred from a provider's marketing, and nothing is connected to your systems.

  1. 01

    Profile the business

    Volume, channels, markets, average transaction value and card mix establish your Payment DNA™ — the shape Renlow's modelled reference position is set to.

  2. 02

    Assess the estate

    Providers, gateways, pricing model, settlement terms, payment methods and contract position are captured from your own documentation and answers.

  3. 03

    Score six dimensions

    Each dimension is scored 0–100 against Renlow's modelled reference position for a business shaped like yours, rather than against an absolute ideal.

  4. 04

    Roll up and quantify

    Dimension scores combine into a single 0–1000 Renlow Score™, and each gap is translated into an annual monetary estimate.

05

What we analyse

Credibility depends on being explicit about the evidence base — and about its boundaries.

Inputs we use

  • Your assessment answers on providers, contracts, channels and markets
  • Fee schedules, statements and settlement summaries you choose to share
  • Published scheme and interchange rates for your regions and card types
  • Renlow internal reference points for a comparable payment shape — directional modelling inputs, not measurements of other businesses

What we do not use

  • Provider marketing claims or headline rates
  • Referral or commission arrangements — Renlow takes none
  • Personal cardholder data, which never enters the assessment
  • Live access to your systems; nothing is connected or integrated
06

Limits and governance

What the Renlow Score™ is not. Stated plainly, because a methodology that overclaims is not worth trusting.

Estimates, not audited figures
Monetary opportunities are modelled from the data you provide and published rates. They are directional decision support, not a guarantee or a quote.
Accuracy follows input quality
A score built on statements and settlement data is materially more precise than one built on recollection. Where an input is missing, we say so rather than infer it.
A model, not a market average
Reference values are Renlow's own modelling assumptions applied to your volume, channel mix and market count. They are not measurements of other businesses. Where the basis behind a figure is not established, no comparison is shown.
Weighting is not published
The relative weighting of each dimension is proprietary. Every input that contributes is listed above, so a result can always be interrogated.

Next step

See the framework applied to your business.

The assessment takes about five minutes. You receive a Renlow Score™ across all six dimensions, with each gap quantified.

Get my Renlow ScoreRead an example report